Reach out for details!
When it comes to securing a new Build-To-Order (BTO) flat or Executive Condominium (EC) unit in Singapore, buyers often go through a balloting process. But not all ballots are the same. HDB relies on a computerised balloting system, while private developers typically use a manual ballot during launch day. Both methods aim to ensure fairness, but which one is better? Let’s explore.
HDB’s process is fully automated and centralised, ensuring consistency across all BTO launches.
Impartial and transparent: A computerised draw eliminates human bias.
Priority allocation: First-timers, families, and those under special schemes enjoy better chances.
Convenience: No need to attend a physical event; results are announced online.
Scalability: Handles tens of thousands of applications smoothly.
Less excitement: The process feels impersonal since applicants just wait for results.
Limited visibility: Buyers cannot “see” how the ballot is conducted, which may cause doubts among some.
Heavier weighting: Priority schemes mean second-timers may feel disadvantaged.
Private developers often conduct balloting in person at the showflat, especially when demand is high.
Visible fairness: Buyers witness the draw, which enhances credibility.
Event atmosphere: Creates excitement and transparency on launch day.
Equal footing: Every registrant has the same chance once eligibility is cleared—no extra weighting.
Physical presence needed: Buyers (or their representatives) usually must attend the event.
More stressful: The live draw can be nerve-wracking, especially with crowds.
Limited scalability: Works well for hundreds or a few thousand applications, but not tens of thousands.
The answer depends on what buyers value more:
If you prefer convenience and a structured, system-wide approach, the HDB computerised ballot is better. It removes the hassle of attending an event and ensures that national housing policies (like first-timer priority) are applied consistently.
If you prefer visible fairness and a sense of participation, the developer manual ballot may feel more reassuring. Seeing names drawn in person makes the process tangible and builds confidence that everyone has a fair shot.
Both systems have merits:
HDB’s computerised ballot is efficient, scalable, and policy-driven.
Developer manual balloting offers transparency, excitement, and buyer engagement.
Ultimately, neither system guarantees you the unit you want—the main purpose is to ensure fair distribution when demand exceeds supply. Buyers should focus on preparing early, registering interest on time, and staying updated on launch procedures.
👉 Looking to apply for an upcoming EC launch? Register with official developer teams to secure your ballot chance and maximise your opportunities.